Tales Accursed: A Folk Horror Anthology selected and illustrated by Richard Wells

Folk horror is not a subgenre I’ve ever really taken the time to explore, so I wasn’t sure what to expect from this new anthology selected and illustrated by the artist Richard Wells. What I found was a collection of sixteen stories, most of them from the 19th and early 20th centuries, all blending folklore with elements of the supernatural and lonely rural settings. Each story is accompanied by a beautiful lino print illustration by Wells which I’m sure will look even more impressive in the physical edition of the book than in the ebook version I read.

The stories are arranged chronologically, beginning with Sheridan Le Fanu’s The White Cat of Drumgunniol from 1870 and ending with Shirley Jackson’s The Man in the Woods, published posthumously in 2014. I had read both of these authors before (although not these particular stories) and there were two other authors I’d also read previously – John Buchan and E.F. Benson – but the others were all new to me. In fact, there were several I’d never even heard of until now, so it was good to be made aware of them and to be able to try their work for the first time.

As with most anthologies, the stories vary in quality. However, I found that there wasn’t much variety in terms of plot or setting. Many of them, particularly the older ones, are based on Celtic folklore and have similar structures, with our narrator travelling in an unfamiliar part of the countryside and meeting someone who tells them a story about strange sightings or occurrences, which the narrator then experiences for themselves. Although this did make the collection as a whole feel slightly formulaic and repetitive, there were still some stories that were different and stood out. One of these is Woe Water by H.R. Wakefield, which unfolds in the form of diary entries written by a man with a troubled past who moves into a remote lakeside cabin and begins to struggle with his conscience. I also enjoyed Elinor Mordaunt’s The Country-Side, told from the perspective of a parson’s wife whose relationship with her unfaithful husband takes a sinister turn when she meets an old woman in the village who is said to be a witch.

Ancient Lights by Algernon Blackwood is another highlight – it has a wonderfully eerie atmosphere as the narrator describes his journey through enchanted ancient woodland. The Shirley Jackson story, The Man in the Woods, in which a man accompanied by a stray cat stumbles upon an old house inhabited by three strange people, is also very good. It’s packed with references to mythology and witchcraft and there are lots of layers to unravel, but the open ending left me frustrated and wanting to know more!

Despite the ‘folk horror’ label in the title, I found the stories in this collection creepy or unsettling rather than frightening. I deliberately haven’t said much about any of the individual stories because some of them are very short and it would be easy to spoil them, but overall I did enjoy the book and am interested in reading more by some of these authors.

Thanks to Unbound for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.

I’m counting this as my second book towards this year’s RIP challenge.

My Commonplace Book: September 2024

A selection of quotes and pictures to represent September’s reading:

commonplace book
noun
a book into which notable extracts from other works are copied for personal use.

~

“A man is responsible for his deeds, and not just the deeds, but for the consequences of those deeds, as well.”

Ordeal by Innocence by Agatha Christie (1958)

~

Venetia Stanley, c. 1914

Yet there was no such thing in politics as true friendship. There could never be absolute trust, not when one was Prime Minister.

Precipice by Robert Harris (2024)

~

She remembered something her revered German teacher at Oxford, Cecil Fairfax, liked to say. That there were two kinds of people, those who made something of their life and those to whom life merely happened.

Midnight in Vienna by Jane Thynne (2024)

~

Had she but known it, it was the happiest time of her life. If there were only some guide near us all, to cry halt when we reach the summit of our joy, to say, ‘Pause here, do not waste time looking back, do not try to rush forward, for there is nothing better to come,’ how different life might be!

Tales Accursed: A Folk Horror Anthology selected by Richard Wells (2024)
Quote from The Country-Side by Elinor Mordaunt (1917)

~

Binaural microphone

The speaker said life is about change. That’s how we grow and develop, but to change we have to let go of the past. Most of us, she said, are bad at this, especially when a situation that was good turns bad. We cling to the past and deny the need for change, telling ourselves everything is as fine as it ever was, when it isn’t.

The Examiner by Janice Hallett (2024)

~

Favourite books read in September:

The Examiner, Precipice and Midnight in Vienna

Authors read for the first time in September:

Jane Thynne, Fiona Macleod, AC Benson, Algernon Blackwood, Elinor Mordaunt, Ulric Daubeny, Margery Lawrence, MR James, Eleanor Scott, Frederick Cowles, HR Wakefield, William Croft Dickinson, LTC Rolt

Places visited in my September reading:

England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Austria

~

Reading notes: I didn’t finish many books this month, for various reasons, but I enjoyed most of what I did read and that’s more important. I also have a long list of new-to-me authors read for the first time this month, thanks to the short story anthology Tales Accursed. As you can see, I’m behind with reviews again but will try to catch up with those in October. Also in October, I will be joining in with 1970 Club hosted by Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings and Stuck in a Book, and have already started my first book for that event.

How was your September? What will you be reading in October?

Mary I: Queen of Sorrows by Alison Weir

This is the third novel in Alison Weir’s Tudor Rose trilogy, following Elizabeth of York: The Last White Rose and Henry VIII: The Heart and the Crown. You definitely don’t need to have read the previous two books before starting this one, although if you’re not very familiar with Tudor history it would probably be helpful to read them in order.

The novel begins in 1525, introducing us to nine-year-old Mary who has recently become betrothed to Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain. As the daughter of Henry VIII and his Spanish wife, Katherine of Aragon, a marriage between Mary and Charles would cement England’s alliance with Spain. Mary’s future looks bright, but things don’t go as planned and it’s not long before her whole life is thrown into turmoil. First, Charles decides he doesn’t want to wait for Mary to grow up and takes another bride, one who is richer and old enough to give him children. Then, Mary’s father becomes obsessed with the idea of marrying Anne Boleyn and casts Mary’s mother aside.

It would be difficult not to sympathise with the young Mary as she is put under pressure to betray her mother and denounce her Catholic faith, gains and loses one stepmother after another and, with the arrival of a younger half-sister and half-brother, becomes uncertain of her place in the succession. However, I did find these early sections of the book quite repetitive as having read all of Weir’s Six Tudor Queens series, as well as her novel on Henry VIII, I felt that there wasn’t much here that was new to me. The second half of the book interested me more as it moved on to Mary’s own reign as Queen, her marriage to Philip of Spain and her ‘phantom pregnancies’, and, of course, the persecution of Protestants that famously gained her the nickname ‘Bloody Mary’.

On finishing the book and reading the author’s note at the end, I was interested to find that Alison Weir herself felt that she and Mary shared some childhood experiences, such as the separation of their parents and dislike of the new woman in their father’s life; this probably explains why the chapters dealing with Mary’s early years are written with such sympathy and understanding. Later in the novel, however, Mary becomes a much more difficult character to like as she ignores advice and public opinion, makes some poor decisions, and those who don’t share her Catholic faith burn at the stake. Weir states that she found it hard to make the adult Mary sympathetic when the historical evidence tells us otherwise.

As I wouldn’t want anyone to accidentally buy the same book twice, be aware that the US title of this book is The Passionate Tudor: A Novel of Queen Mary I. Alison Weir’s next novel, coming in 2025, stays in the Tudor period and is about the rise and fall of Cardinal Wolsey. I’ve never read a book written from Wolsey’s perspective before, so that should be interesting.

Thanks to Headline for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.

Book 43/50 for the Historical Fiction Reading Challenge 2024

Top Ten Tuesday: Books on my Autumn TBR

This week’s topic for Top Ten Tuesday (hosted by That Artsy Reader Girl) is: “Books on My Fall 2024 To-Read List”.

I have a lot more than ten books I’m hoping to read this autumn, but here’s a selection of them:

For the upcoming 1970 Club:

1. God is an Englishman by RF Delderfield
2. Passenger to Frankfurt by Agatha Christie

For Margaret Atwood Reading Month:

3. The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood

For Novellas in November:

4. Fire by John Boyne

Some review copies:

5. The Bells of Westminster by Leonora Nattrass
6. The Glassmaker by Tracy Chevalier
7. The Royal Rebel by Elizabeth Chadwick
8. The Voyage Home by Pat Barker
9. The Significance of Swans by Rhiannon Lewis
10. The Labyrinth House Murders by Yukito Ayatsuji

~

Which books are on your autumn/fall TBR?

Historical Musings #87: HWA Crown Awards 2024

Welcome to my not-quite-monthly post on all things historical fiction!

This month, I want to highlight the HWA Crown Award longlists which were announced on X last Wednesday by the Historical Writers Association. There are three separate awards – one for debut novels, one for non-fiction and the other (the Gold Crown) for authors who have previously published. The shortlists are announced in October and the winner in November. I have no plans to try to read all of these books, but thought it would be interesting to look at what I’ve read so far from each list.

Gold Crown Award 2024 longlist

The Glutton by AK Blakemore
The Fox Wife by Yangsze Choo
Clear by Carys Davies
You Dreamed of Empires by Álvaro Enrigue, tr Natasha Wimmer
Disobedient by Elizabeth Fremantle
Loot by Tania James
The Book of Days by Francesca Kay
Quint by Robert Lautner
Cast a Cold Eye by Robbie Morrison
A Woman of Pleasure by Kiyoko Murata, tr Juliet Winters Carpenter
Cahokia Jazz by Francis Spufford
Absolutely and Forever by Rose Tremain

I enjoyed Disobedient, about the painter Artemisia Gentileschi, but I was a bit disappointed by the Yangsze Choo, which I found very slow. Absolutely and Forever (also shortlisted for this year’s Walter Scott Prize) and Cahokia Jazz are already on my TBR, and I’ll consider reading the two translated books as I’m making an effort to read more historical fiction in translation. I’m not familiar with any of the others on the list.

Non-fiction Crown Award 2024 longlist

I Seek a Kind Person by Julian Borger
Final Verdict by Tobias Buck
Messalina by Honor Cargill-Martin
Don’t Let’s Be Beastly to the Germans by Daniel Cowling
The Shoulders We Stand On by Preeti Dhillon
Survivors by Hannah Durkin
The Exiled by Lucy Fulford
Four Shots In the Night by Henry Hemming
Agincourt by Michael Livingston
The Picnic by Matthew Longo
A Dirty, Filthy Book by Michael Meyer
Impossible Monsters by Michael Taylor

I haven’t read any of these, but as I don’t read a lot of non-fiction in general, that’s not really surprising. I’ve investigated the titles on this list and I feel that there’s not a lot of variety this year, with most of the books dealing with either war or race and immigration. Still, I’m sure they are all interesting reads and if you’ve read any of them, I would like to hear your recommendations.

Debut Crown Award 2024 longlist

The Other Side of Mrs Wood by Lucy Barker
The Golden Gate by Amy Chua
Leeward by Katie Daysh
Colours of Siena by Judith May Evans
The Maiden by Kate Foster
The Painter’s Daughters by Emily Howes
All Us Sinners by Katy Massey
The Hideous Progeny by C.E. McGill
The Witching Tide by Margaret Meyer
The Beholders by Hester Musson
The Revels by Stacey Thomas
The Tumbling Girl by Bridget Walsh

I loved the Lucy Barker; the other two books I’ve read from this list were enjoyable enough but not necessarily books I would have expected to see nominated for awards. I was already interested in reading The Maiden after enjoying Kate Foster’s new book, The King’s Witches, earlier this year and The Tumbling Girl sounds fun, but I’m not sure if I’ll look for any of the others.

~

What do you think of these longlists? Have you read any of these books or are there any you would like to read?

Ordeal by Innocence by Agatha Christie

The September choice for the Read Christie 2024 challenge is Ordeal by Innocence, a book which, along with Crooked House, Christie herself named as one she felt most satisfied with. It was first published in 1958 and is a standalone novel, with no Poirot, Miss Marple or any of Christie’s other recurring characters.

The novel begins with Dr Arthur Calgary visiting the Argyle family at their home, Sunny Point, to give them what he hopes will be some very welcome news. Two years earlier, Jacko Argyle was found guilty of the murder of his adoptive mother. Although he claimed to have an alibi, he was unable to prove it and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Now, Dr Calgary has come forward to confirm that he was with Jacko at the time of the murder, therefore he couldn’t have committed the crime. Calgary seems to have a valid reason for not speaking out sooner – a head injury affecting his memory, followed by a long trip to the Antarctic – but it’s now too late to help Jacko, who has died of pneumonia in prison. Still, Calgary hopes his belated evidence will bring some comfort to the family. However, it has the complete opposite effect…because if Jacko didn’t kill Mrs Argyle, who did?

This is a novel driven by characters, personalities and motives rather than one with a lot of plot. Most of the book is made up of conversations between various members of the Argyle household as they discuss amongst themselves and with Superintendent Huish the events that took place the night of Mrs Argyle’s murder and who they think could be responsible. There’s the dead woman’s husband, Leo Argyle, who is now planning to marry his secretary, Gwenda; there are the other four adopted Argyle children, Mary, Micky, Tina and Hester, all now adults who have had one reason or another to resent their adoptive mother; and Kirsten Lindstrom, their Swedish nurse who has been with the family for many years. It (unbelievably) doesn’t seem to occur to Dr Calgary, until it is pointed out to him, that by clearing Jacko’s name he has simply cast suspicion on the rest of the family again, but this becomes a major theme of the book – the idea that only the guilty person knows the truth, therefore it’s the innocent who suffer the most:

“The family would come under suspicion,” he said, “and it might remain under suspicion for a long time – perhaps for ever. If one of the family was guilty it is possible that they themselves would not know which one. They would look at each other and – wonder… Yes, that’s what would be the worst of all. They themselves would not know which…”

Another theme Christie tackles in this book is adoption and the question of nature vs nurture. Sadly, her opinion of adoption seems to be quite a negative one, with several characters stating that the relationship between a child and their adoptive mother can never be as strong as with their biological mother. It’s also strongly implied that some of the Argyle children have criminal tendencies because they’ve inherited those traits from their birth parents and are destined to be bad people regardless of how much love and attention they receive from their adoptive parents. These are not views I agree with, but clearly they are subjects Christie was interested in and wanted to explore in this novel.

As a standalone, I think this book suffers from not really having a character who does any ‘detecting’. Dr Calgary does take on this role eventually, wrapping things up for us in the final chapter, but otherwise we don’t see much of Superintendent Huish and the only member of the Argyle household who shows any interest in trying to solve the crime is Mary Argyle’s husband, Philip. There’s not much action until very late in the book, so most of the focus is on the characters discussing their memories of Mrs Argyle and what they were doing at the time of her death. In this respect, the book reminded me of Five Little Pigs, another Christie novel which deals with a mystery from the past.

Next month, and for the rest of the year, the Read Christie challenge will be moving on to books published in the 1960s and 1970s. I have plenty of those still to read!

I’m counting this as my first book towards this year’s RIP challenge.

Precipice by Robert Harris

Robert Harris became a must-read author for me after reading and loving An Officer and a Spy, the Cicero trilogy and Conclave, but some of his more recent books have left me feeling slightly disappointed. His new one, Precipice, sounded promising, but would it be a return to form?

The novel opens in London in the summer of 1914 and introduces us to Venetia Stanley, a twenty-six-year-old woman from a wealthy, aristocratic family. Venetia is growing bored with the aimlessness of her days and the spoiled, shallow group of friends, known as the Coterie, that she has fallen in with, so when Herbert Henry Asquith begins an affair with her she sees it as a welcome escape. Not only is Asquith more than twice her age, he is also the Prime Minister and Venetia finds it flattering that he seems to value her opinion on politics and includes her in discussions on important matters of state.

Asquith is currently preoccupied with the situation in Ireland where the Nationalists are campaigning for Home Rule, but soon he has an even bigger problem to deal with as tensions begin to escalate in Europe and it looks increasingly possible that Britain could be pulled into a war. At this crucial moment in British history, it seems that the security of the nation is being put at risk – several confidential documents giving details of the government’s military and diplomatic plans have been found by members of the public and handed to the police. Only a small number of high-ranking government ministers have access to this information so, unlikely as it seems, one of them must be responsible for the leaks. Detective Sergeant Paul Deemer is given the task of investigating and it’s not long before he makes a shocking discovery.

Although I’ve read many novels set during WWI, they’ve usually dealt with ordinary people rather than politicians and certainly haven’t been written from the perspective of the Prime Minister. I knew nothing about H.H. Asquith’s private life, what he was like as a person or how he was viewed by his friends, colleagues and the public, so I learned a lot from this book. Harris draws on Asquith’s published letters to Venetia Stanley as one of his main sources and quotes from them extensively throughout the novel (Venetia’s letters to Asquith were apparently destroyed, so Harris uses his imagination to recreate them).

The impression I got of Asquith from this book, as a politician, was of a generally well-meaning man who was competent enough as a peacetime Prime Minister (apart from where the challenge of Ireland was concerned) but definitely not the right person to lead the country through a war. His overly cautious approach in the early stages was very frustrating to watch; it’s likely that the outbreak of war was inevitable and nothing he could have done would have averted it, but he didn’t seem to grasp the seriousness of the situation at all and refused to commit Britain one way or the other when he was being pressed from all sides to take decisive action. Even when war did break out, it seemed to be of less importance to him than his relationship with Venetia and again it was frustrating to see him sitting composing letters to her during cabinet meetings and plotting ways to escape from political duties to go and visit her. Although the general public weren’t supposed to know about the affair, it was an open secret amongst their family members and I couldn’t help feeling sorry for Margot, Asquith’s wife.

The thriller element of the novel is weaker and although I was never bored, the book never quite became unputdownable either. There’s no real mystery surrounding the security breaches because both we and Paul Deemer know from very early on who is responsible, but it’s still interesting to see how Deemer approaches the situation and there’s an entertaining section where he goes undercover in Wales in search of more information. There’s also a small twist towards the end of the book, which I hadn’t really seen coming, although it had started to occur to me that something wasn’t quite right!

Precipice is definitely more historical fiction than thriller, which may or may not appeal depending on your personal taste. Although it hasn’t become one of my absolute favourites by Robert Harris, I really enjoyed it for the fascinating insights into Asquith and his government.

Thanks to Hutchinson Heinemann for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.

Book 42/50 for the Historical Fiction Reading Challenge 2024