The Scholars by MacKenzie Common

Having enjoyed MacKenzie Common’s previous book, The Six Murders of Daphne St Clair, about a ninety-year-old woman looking back on her life as a serial killer, I was interested in trying her new one, another crime novel this time set at Oxford University.

The Scholars follows five students who are awarded Oxford’s coveted Shepherd Scholarship, an award given only to the most exceptional candidates each year, many of whom go on to become world leaders in their fields. This year’s Shepherd Scholars consist of Azelle, a social media influencer from South Africa; Mabel, a young Canadian woman who runs a charity providing clean water to remote villages in India; Hugo, the son of a prominent British politician; and two Americans, Hadley, a history academic who is researching pogroms and riots, and Finn, who is developing an AI grief counselling service.

The five students seem to have very little in common and tensions develop within the group almost immediately. When one of them is killed after falling from a roof, it’s unclear whether or not it was an accident, but rumours quickly begin to circulate that they were pushed – and that one of the other four Shepherd Scholars was responsible. Then it emerges that the dead student has left behind a proposal for a book they were planning to write, featuring four fictional characters with strong resemblances to the four remaining Scholars. If the book had been published, it would have revealed secrets the Scholars have been trying to keep hidden. All four have a strong motive for the murder, then, but which, if any, was the culprit?

The story unfolds from the perspectives of each of the four students, all of whom are unreliable narrators, hiding their pasts from each other and from the reader, until it becomes impossible to keep things secret any longer. Their secrets are terrible ones – the kind that can ruin reputations and careers – and this raises some interesting questions about the integrity of the scholarships, the vetting process and whether candidates should be judged on their current achievements or whether their personal histories should be taken into account. I didn’t like any of the four surviving students and we probably weren’t supposed to, but there were two that I eventually began to warm to slightly and two that I didn’t. I suspected one character of being the killer from early in the book and was correct to suspect them – although a twist right at the end turned everything on its head again!

Although there were things I liked about this book, there were also some things I had problems with. First, once the murder took place I would have expected more involvement from the police and the university, yet the four students just seem to be left to continue their studies as if nothing had happened and even after their secrets are exposed the police still don’t come to speak to them regarding motives etc. The only investigations we see being carried out are by the four students themselves and random people discussing the case on social media. I also felt that although there are some nice descriptions of the city of Oxford, the university setting never really comes to life.

After a slow start, I became drawn into the story, but I think I would have enjoyed it more if there had been even one character I could have liked or connected with in some way. I preferred MacKenzie Common’s previous book, but will still be looking out for her next one.

Thanks to Mountain Leopard Press for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.

I’m counting this towards RIPXXI hosted by @perilreaders

The Six Murders of Daphne St Clair by MacKenzie Common

Daphne St Clair is a ninety-year-old grandmother in poor health who lives at Coconut Grove Senior Home in Florida. Probably not anyone’s idea of a typical serial killer, but when another elderly resident is found dead in the home, Daphne calls the police and confesses to not only this murder but several more, spanning four states, two countries and seven decades. The police, Daphne’s family and the public are both shocked and intrigued – what could have made Daphne want to kill so many people? And why has she chosen to confess now, at this late stage of her life?

When the news of Daphne’s confession begins to spread, she is contacted by journalists and reporters wanting to be first to tell her story, but she turns them all down – except one. Ruth Robinson hopes to start a podcast about Daphne’s life and even has a title ready for it – The Murders of Daphne St Clair. Something draws Daphne to the younger woman and she agrees to be interviewed for the podcast, but as her story unfolds she begins to discover that there’s more to Ruth than meets the eye. Who is Ruth Robinson and what’s the real reason for the podcast?

I had never heard of MacKenzie Common (it seems she has previously written a YA mystery novel, although this is her first book for adults), but I was attracted by the elegant, eye-catching cover and the premise of a ninety-year-old serial killer who had spent her whole life literally getting away with murder! I did enjoy the book, with a few reservations which I’ll mention later in this review, but overall it was quite an entertaining read.

Daphne’s tale begins in Canada in the 1930s, where she grew up on a farm near a small town in Saskatchewan. After a difficult childhood, Daphne runs away from home at the age of sixteen and makes her way to Winnipeg, where she meets the man who will become her first victim. He’s an unpleasant, violent man and his death is more of an accident than a murder, so at this stage of the book, Daphne seems a sympathetic character. This quickly changes as Daphne’s actions become more senseless and inexcusable and she shows no repentance for what she has done. I disliked her more and more as the novel progressed, but at the same time, she’s a clever, witty narrator and her story is engaging.

The structure of the book was a problem for me. Daphne’s narrative is broken into short sections, some of which are written in her own first person perspective and some in the form of dialogue for the podcast. These are then interspersed with chapters from Ruth’s perspective as she carries out some investigations of her own into Daphne’s background and one particular murder that is of special interest to her. I felt that the switches from one character to the other happened too quickly and too often, which stopped the story from flowing as well as it could have done. On top of this, there are also frequent interruptions from true crime fans discussing the show on Reddit and speculating on who Daphne is going to kill next, and a fashion blogger on TikTok who imagines outfits Daphne may have worn at key moments in her life. I could have done without these as well, but they do illustrate the moral issues of treating criminals like celebrities.

The ending of the novel leaves an important question unanswered; we can decide for ourselves what happened (or what we would have liked to have happened) but I would have preferred to know for certain! This wasn’t a perfect book, then, but not many are and there were definitely more things I liked than disliked.

Thanks to Headline/Mountain Leopard Press for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.