A few years ago I read Anthony Horowitz’s Magpie Murders, a wonderful, imaginative novel containing a story-within-a-story – the outer one being a crime story set in the contemporary publishing world and the inner one being an entire Golden-Age-style murder mystery featuring a detective called Atticus Pünd. When I finished that book I remember feeling disappointed that there weren’t more Atticus Pünd novels to read, so I was delighted to find that Horowitz’s latest book, Moonflower Murders, is written in the same format.
Both books stand alone so it’s not essential to have read Magpie Murders before starting Moonflower Murders (although there are a few references in this one to the events of the previous book). At the beginning of the novel, we rejoin Susan Ryeland who is now running a small hotel in Crete with her boyfriend, Andreas. It’s not quite the idyllic life Susan had hoped for, though, and just as she is beginning to long for her old career in publishing, two guests approach her with an intriguing proposition.
Their names are Lawrence and Pauline Treherne and they run a hotel of their own in England, where a murder took place eight years ago. Stefan Codrescu, one of the hotel employees, was found guilty of the murder, but the Trehernes’ daughter, Cecily, has always believed him to be innocent. Now Cecily has disappeared, just after telling her parents that she had uncovered a clue in an Alan Conway novel called Atticus Pünd Takes the Case which proves that the wrong man had been charged with the crime. Knowing that Susan was the editor who worked on the Atticus Pünd novels in her publishing days, the Trehernes have come to ask for her help. What was the clue Alan Conway hid within the pages of his novel? Is Stefan innocent or guilty? And what has happened to Cecily?
After several chapters in which Susan begins to investigate the events of eight years earlier and how they could be connected with Cecily’s disappearance, we have the pleasure of reading the whole of Atticus Pünd Takes the Case, a detective novel dealing with the murder of a famous actress. Although this story-within-a-story is enjoyable in its own right, at first it’s not clear how it is linked to the murder at the Trehernes’ hotel, but Susan’s knowledge of how Alan Conway’s mind worked helps her to pick out possible hints and clues. I certainly didn’t manage to solve the mysteries – either the one in the Pünd story or the one in the framing story – myself, but I enjoyed watching everything unfold.
I didn’t love this book quite as much as Magpie Murders, probably because I already knew what to expect so it didn’t feel as original, but it was still hugely entertaining and, like the previous novel, packed with word games and other little puzzles cleverly woven into the text. And of course, as an Agatha Christie fan I adore the Atticus Pünd stories in both books, which are such perfect homages to Christie herself. As we have been told that the fictional author Alan Conway apparently wrote a whole series of Atticus Pünd novels, I hope Anthony Horowitz will give us the opportunity to read at least one more of them!
Thanks to Random House UK for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.
This is book 12/20 from my 20 Books of Summer list.
I have a feeling I’d like the Atticus Pund story within this novel the best, too. 🙂
The Atticus Pund stories would make a great series just on their own!
I didn’t like these books as well as you did, especially the second one in which Horowitz puts himself in the book as a character. I thought they were too facile or something. You didn’t mention that in this review, so perhaps he decided that wasn’t the best idea.
This is a different series to the ones where Horowitz uses himself as a character. I liked those books too but I prefer this series, I think.
No I’m sure it was the first one with that detective.
Oh, no, it’s a different detective. You’re right.
This sounds clever, though I think the framing device might start to feel a bit like a gimmic if it continues through multiple books. I may give the Magpie Murders a go sometime though, as I think I would enjoy it as a one-off.
These books are a bit gimmicky, I suppose, although I don’t really mind as I find them so enjoyable.
this sounds so intriguing; a mystery within a mystery. I tried reading Horowitz a few years back though not this series and it just did not work for me. But this series sounds very interesting. I think I will give it a try! wonderful review as always!
Thank you! If you do read this series I hope you like these books better than the other one you tried.
I have finished this book this week. It was good, whilst not as good as the first, the idea I suppose already done, it was still an enjoyable read. I did work some bits of it out, though had the wrong person but the right idea!
It will be interesting to see if he goes anywhere with this series of books again. Though I do prefer these to the Daniel Hawthorne Novels he has also written.
p.s. I am not sure I can top your review!
I’m sure you’ll write a great review! I do like the Daniel Hawthorne novels as well, but I think Magpie Murders and this one are better.