Clare Carson has previously written a trilogy of thrillers (the Sam Coyle trilogy) set in contemporary Orkney. I haven’t read those, but the title and cover of her new novel, The Canary Keeper, caught my attention and when I investigated I found that this one is a historical crime novel, still set in Orkney but during the Victorian period. I love a good Victorian mystery, so of course I had to give it a try.
The story begins in London in 1855, with the body of Tobias Skaill being found dumped in the Thames. Witnesses report seeing the body thrown from a canoe – surely the work of an Esquimaux! The suspect has disappeared without trace, but it seems he may have had an accomplice: Birdie Quinn, a young Irishwoman who was seen walking in the area at the time. We, the reader, know that Birdie is innocent; she had only met Tobias for the first time the day before when he had tried to give her a message. Her presence by the river that night was a coincidence and she has certainly never had any dealings with Esquimaux. But how can she prove her innocence?
Birdie knows that when the law catches up with her, she will hang, so she turns for help to Solomon, a policeman with whom she was recently in a relationship before they went their separate ways. Solomon advises her to get away from London for a while – and with evidence linking the dead man with the Orkney Islands off the north-east coast of Scotland, that is where Birdie decides to head. Can she uncover the truth surrounding Tobias Skaill’s death and identify his killer in time to clear her own name?
The Canary Keeper explores so many interesting ideas and topics. First, there is Orkney itself and the many traditions, myths and beliefs that are unique to those islands and their people. Then there is the famous Arctic expedition led by Captain John Franklin in search of the North-West Passage, ending in tragedy when both ships, HMS Erebus and HMS Terror, are lost. The Franklin Expedition takes place just a few years before the events of The Canary Keeper and as Birdie begins to investigate she find several surprising links between the doomed expedition and the murder of Tobias Skaill. The fur trade also plays a part in the story and, in the London sections of the book, we learn about some of the trade guilds and livery companies of the period.
Clare Carson also creates some interesting characters, at least on the surface. I found Birdie quite a likeable heroine and I enjoyed her scenes with Solomon, hoping that they might decide to give each other a second chance. There’s also Morag, whose unconventional lifestyle leads to her being labelled a witch, and the widowed Margaret Skaill who is determined to keep her husband’s shipping business going despite her inability to read and write. And yet, none of these characters ever came fully to life for me; there was a disappointing flatness throughout the novel, which I blame on the fact that it is written in third person present tense, probably my least favourite way for a novel to be written. I often find that it puts a distance between the reader and the characters and makes it difficult to engage on an emotional level, although maybe that’s just me.
There’s also a paranormal aspect to the novel, with Birdie experiencing visions and flashbacks, but I didn’t feel that these scenes added anything to the story. This could have been a fascinating book – and at times it was – but it wasn’t really for me.
This is book 10/20 of my 20 Books of Summer.
Thanks to Head of Zeus for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.
Hmm, that’s an interesting comment on third person. I’ve heard first person more often being considered amateurish or limiting or something like that. Anyway, it sounded like a promising book, but if you found the characters flat, I won’t try it. A book set in Orkney would be fun, though.
I don’t have a problem with third person past tense – just present tense. I almost always find it annoying for some reason. Orkney is a great setting, though.
Oh, I think I must have missed that. Yes, that would be annoying.
Oh, what a pity! It was sounding so good till you got to your reservations with it, all things that would bother me too. Still, sounds like she’s an author worth watching, if she can be persuaded to give up the present tense!
It’s a shame because I’m sure I would have enjoyed this book much more if it hadn’t been for that annoying present tense!
I think present tense is really annoying ,too! But I do love the idea of that Orkney setting. 🙂
Yes, the Orkney setting was great! It nearly made up for the annoying present tense, but not quite.
I’m not a huge fan of third person present either, Helen. It is why I don’t get on very well with traditional Audio Description in the theatre, as it is always delivered in this way. I think you are right, it immediately pulls the reader/listener out of the story and creates a distance which in turn prevents emotional engagement.
Apart from this drawback, the book sounds as if it has some great potential. As a fan of crime fiction and all things Victorian, I might quite like it.
I’m glad it’s not just me who feels that way about third person present tense. It’s very distracting and I’m not sure why it seems to have become such a popular choice lately. Don’t let me put you off this book, though – I did still find a lot to enjoy and I definitely think it’s worth trying.
Oh yes, if the characters do not come to life, I too am unhappy.
Strong and memorable characters are so important to me. If the characters don’t feel real I’m not likely to enjoy the book.