I loved Young Bess, the first book in Margaret Irwin’s Elizabeth I trilogy, so I didn’t want to wait too long before picking up the second. I was hoping for another great read but, although there was still a lot to like about this book, I didn’t think it was as good as the first one.
Published in 1948, Elizabeth, Captive Princess, continues the story of the young Elizabeth. The novel begins with the death of Elizabeth’s half-brother, Edward VI, leaving the succession to the throne of England in doubt. We then follow the tragic story of Lady Jane Grey, queen for nine days before eventually being beheaded after Elizabeth’s half-sister Mary comes to the throne. This is a fate that Elizabeth could face herself as she also becomes linked with plots and conspiracies during Mary’s reign, leading to her imprisonment in the Tower of London.
Before the novel ends, two very different men have entered Elizabeth’s life: one is Robert Dudley, son of the Duke of Northumberland and another prisoner in the Tower; the other is Philip of Spain, who has come to England at last to marry Queen Mary. I would expect Elizabeth’s relationships with these two men to form the basis of the final book in the trilogy, Elizabeth and the Prince of Spain, but this particular book concentrates on the stories of Lady Jane Grey and Queen Mary. We actually see very little of Elizabeth herself in this book, which I thought was strange as she is the title character, although I suppose it’s not too surprising as a lot of the drama during this specific period was taking place elsewhere.
The lack of focus on Elizabeth wasn’t really a problem for me in itself; after all, in Young Bess it had been the secondary characters that I found most interesting anyway, particularly Thomas Seymour and his brothers Edward and Henry. But the characters in this book just don’t come to life in the way that the Seymours did and I struggled to connect with any of them on an emotional level. This made the novel feel a bit slow and flat, which was disappointing for me after enjoying the first one so much.
I don’t want to sound too negative, though, because I did like this book and the quality of Margaret Irwin’s writing still makes it a worthwhile read. I love her descriptive writing and the way she recreates Tudor London:
It was seven o’clock as they entered the city of London. The sun was setting in a fury of flame and storm-clouds. All the dark rickety wooden houses leaning top-heavily across the streets as though they were nodding to each other, all but rubbing each other’s foreheads, all seemed to have put on scarves and petticoats, so many bright cloths fluttered from the windows, while the gaily painted shop signs flaunted and creaked and clattered in the breeze.
Away from the main storylines, I enjoyed all the other little details of 16th century life and 16th century history. For example, I was interested in the account of the Edward Bonaventure’s voyages to the White Sea and the ‘strange land of endless snow’ which I first read about in The Ringed Castle by Dorothy Dunnett.
Having come this far, I will be finishing the trilogy with Elizabeth and the Prince of Spain, but will then look forward to reading some of Margaret Irwin’s other books. I have The Galliard, her novel about Mary, Queen of Scots and the Earl of Bothwell on my TBR and would also like to read The Stranger Prince, about Prince Rupert of the Rhine.
I’d really like to read The Galliard. Mary, Queen of Scots, has always been a favorite of mine. (And one of the reasons I went to Scotland years ago.)
I will be reading that one after I finish the Elizabeth trilogy.
Imagine living life with murder around every corner! I have nothing even close to that to worry about.
I enjoy reading about the Tudors, but I wouldn’t have wanted to be one!
The Stranger Prince was life-changing for me – I read it when I was about fourteen and fell in love not only with Prince Rupert but with the whole Civil War period. Her subsequent novels about Montrose, The Proud Servant and The Bride, are also very good. But when I read her Elizabeth trilogy, fairly recently, I thought they hadn’t aged especially well – a lot of tell and not a lot of show!
It’s wonderful when a book comes along that can change your life like that. I’ll look forward to reading it myself eventually. I really enjoyed the first Elizabeth book, Young Bess, but I thought this one was a bit disappointing – I agree that there’s too much telling rather than showing.
I agree that Young Bess is the best of the three although I haven’t reread this one for years. You make me want to! I have a vivid memory of a scene in the third book where Elizabeth is hidden and Philip (infinitely creepy) knows she is there and is talking to Mary about her.
I always felt very sympathetic towards Lady Jane Gray, bullied by everyone in her life. I recommend a book called Another Spring by Katherine Eyre (wondering where it is – it used to live next to the Elizabeth trilogy).
Like Pam, I fell in love with Prince Rupert and Montrose in Irwin’s later books.
I’ll look out for that scene when I get to it in the third book! Yes, I always feel sorry for Lady Jane too, sacrificed for other people’s ambitions. I’ve read a few other books about her, but not Another Spring; Katherine Eyre’s books all seem to be out of print unfortunately.
To tell the truth, the lack of focus on Elizabeth I would be a draw more than drawback for me!
I can understand that! I’m not a big fan of Elizabeth myself.