The January theme for the Read Christie 2020 challenge is ‘a book that changed Christie’s life’. The challenge is hosted by agathachristie.com and their selection for this month was Christie’s first novel, The Mysterious Affair at Styles, but that would be a re-read for me so I chose a different title from their list of alternative suggestions: Murder on the Orient Express!
Murder on the Orient Express is one of Christie’s best known books and has been adapted several times for television, film and stage, but this is precisely why I’ve been putting off reading it for so long – I already knew the solution to the mystery and thought that might affect my enjoyment of the book. Of course, no adaptation is going to be exactly the same as the written version, and once I started reading I could see that some parts of the story were familiar but not all of it.
At the beginning of the novel, Hercule Poirot is in Turkey when he receives a telegram requesting him to return to London. He attempts to book a first-class berth on the Orient Express which is leaving Istanbul that night, but is told that the train is unusually full. It is only with the assistance of Monsieur Bouc, the director of the railway company, who happens to be an old friend of Poirot’s, that he manages to obtain a space in a second-class compartment. Once on board the train, Poirot observes that his fellow passengers are a very diverse group of people of different nationalities, backgrounds and classes. Among them are an American businessman and his secretary, a Russian princess and her German maid, a British Colonel, a Hungarian Count and Countess and several others.
It is the American businessman, Mr Ratchett, who is found stabbed to death in his compartment just after the train comes to a stop in heavy snow near Vinkovci (in what was then part of Yugoslavia). It seems clear that the murderer must be one of the other passengers on the train, but which one? As Poirot begins to investigate, he uncovers clues that, rather than revealing the truth, seem to complicate things further – and the statements he takes from the passengers appear to contradict each other, making the situation even more confusing. Armed with only his ‘little grey cells’, can Poirot solve the mystery?
Yes, of course he can…and for once, so could I, thanks to already knowing the basic outline of the story before I began. It would certainly have been a better – or at least a different – experience to have read the book with no idea of who was responsible for the murder, but as that wasn’t possible, I still enjoyed watching Poirot sort through the evidence and put the pieces of the puzzle together. I think Christie does give us all the information we need, but it’s difficult to say whether I would have been able to guess the solution anyway. Probably not, as I usually don’t.
As well as the mystery, I loved the atmosphere of the book and the claustrophobic feel Christie creates with the simple idea of a train stuck in snow and a murderer onboard. The characterisation is interesting too, although some of the assumptions made about the actions and behaviour of the various suspects based on their nationality feel very dated – for example, M. Bouc’s theory that the murderer must be Italian because the knife is an Italian weapon and Poirot’s reply that he disagrees because the careful, long-term planning requires an ‘Anglo-Saxon brain’. It seems that every passenger on the train has formed a stereotypical view of each of the others and this gives us some insights into attitudes of the time (the book was published in 1934).
Going back to the theme of this month’s Read Christie 2020, I wondered how this book in particular was one that had ‘changed Christie’s life’. Well, it seems that the Orient Express itself did, as she travelled on the train in 1928 to attend an archaeological dig in Syria and it was during this trip that she met the man who would become her second husband. That can certainly be considered a life-changing experience! Anyway, I really enjoyed this book and am looking forward to February’s selection.
14 thoughts on “Murder on the Orient Express by Agatha Christie”
Ahhh – my first Christie, and I loved it! 😀
You picked a great one to start with. 🙂
I think there’s a reason why they do this one over and over. Also, interesting fact about how she met her husband.
Yes, I can see why it’s one of her most popular books. I thought that was interesting about her husband too.
Lindsay Jane Ashford wrote a book called The Woman on the Orient Express. The woman is Agatha Christie. This was a good read as well as getting me interested enough to find out more about Christie’s life
That sounds fascinating. I love Christie’s novels but I don’t know a lot about her life.
I read this book twice. The first time I had no idea who did it. The second I knew from the book and the Suchet adaptation. I also watched the Brannan’s adaptation. I read your review from A to Z, and loved it, specially that nugget of information about how this book changed her life.
I wish I had been able to read it without knowing who did it! Anyway, I still enjoyed it. And yes, I thought that was an interesting fact about how she met her husband.
I love this one almost as much as Death on the Nile. 🙂
I’m hoping to read Death on the Nile for this challenge later in the year.
I guess there’s a reason why this particular mystery is among the favorites of most Christie fans, including myself. I jenuinely think it is one of her best, and I read it years ago before knowing the sollution, so it came as a complete surprise.
Yes, it’s a great book. I enjoyed it, but I think I would have enjoyed it even more if I could have read it before knowing the solution!
I have only read one book by Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None, but I saw the movie recently made from Murder on the Orient Express and found it enjoyable.
I haven’t seen that one, but I’ve seen the older one from the 1970s. It would have been nice to have gone into the book without already knowing the story, though!