I picked up Sarah Winman’s new novel, Still Life, with vague memories of enjoying one of her earlier books, When God Was a Rabbit. That was ten years ago and although she has had two other books published since then, I never got round to reading either of them. The pretty cover of Still Life caught my eye and the Italian setting sounded appealing, so I thought I would give this one a try.
The novel opens in wartime Tuscany in 1944 with a chance meeting between two very different people: Evelyn Skinner, almost sixty-four years old, is an art historian who has come to Italy to try to salvage important works of art; Ulysses Temper is a young British soldier, formerly a globe-maker from London. As the Allies advance across Italy, a brief friendship forms between Evelyn and Ulysses before they are parted and return to their separate lives.
For most of the novel, we follow Ulysses and his friends, first back at home in London and later in Florence, where some of them decide to relocate after the war. There’s Ulysses’ ex-wife, the talented but troubled Peg and her young daughter, Alys; Col who runs the Stoat and Parrot pub and Pete the pianist; Old Cress, who talks to trees and has visions which have a habit of coming true; and a Shakespeare-quoting blue parrot called Claude. It took me a while to warm to these characters, but eventually I became quite fond of some of them, particularly Cress and Alys. None of them are perfect – they all have their flaws and all make mistakes – but they feel like real and believable human beings.
Evelyn, though, appears only occasionally after that opening scene and we have to wait almost until the end of the novel to hear her story – by which time I found I’d lost interest in her and would have preferred to continue reading about Ulysses and the others. Evelyn’s story, which should have been fascinating as it involved a meeting with EM Forster and a pre-war romance with an Italian maid, felt as if it had been squeezed into the end of the book as an afterthought and in my opinion would have worked better if it had unfolded gradually alongside the other storylines.
The novel is beautifully written, there are some lovely descriptions of Florence and the influence of Forster’s A Room With a View can be seen in several different ways throughout the story. With a timespan of several decades, Winman also writes about various historical events that take place during that period; for example, there’s a memorable section set during the devastating flood of the Arno river in 1966. Unfortunately, there was one thing I really disliked about Winman’s writing in this book – and that was the lack of speech marks. I’m never sure what authors are trying to achieve in leaving out basic punctuation. A more ‘literary’ style? A stream of consciousness feel? Whatever it is, it never works for me and I end up just finding it distracting and annoying.
Still Life wasn’t completely successful with me, then, but I did enjoy getting to know the characters and spending some time in Italy in virtual form, which is the closest I will get to a holiday abroad this year!
Thanks to 4th Estate for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.
Book 28/50 read for the 2021 Historical Fiction Reading Challenge.
Book 1/20 of my 20 Books of Summer 2021
8 thoughts on “Still Life by Sarah Winman”
I hate when authors don’t use quotation marks in their dialogue. It is totally distracting! I hope it’s not a growing trend.
It’s so annoying! I’m sure she didn’t do that in the other book I read.
I can’t say I care much for the growing trend of writers not using punctuation, I’m a bit old school that way. The story sounds as though it had potential, and I like the sound of the Italian setting, but I don’t think I’ll be rushing to read it.
I’m old school too when it comes to punctuation and I’m not a fan of experimental or ‘modern’ writing styles at all. I did still enjoy the book overall but not as much as I might otherwise have done.
I’m reading this at the moment, Helen, and loving it. But it was a rocky start because of the lack of speech marks and the constant use of the word ‘said’. I felt sure I wouldn’t enjoy it but the storyline and characters have won me over. I scarcely notice the writing style now.
I’m glad you’re enjoying it. I struggled with the writing style at first but, like you, I was eventually swept away by the characters and their stories.
The lack of speech marks is driving me mad and I’m struggling to get through the first chapters. I’m persevering in the hope that I’ll suddenly like the book but so far it’s a bit of an effort, sadly.
I struggled with the first few chapters too and found the lack of speech marks really annoying and unnecessary! I thought it improved after a while and I ended up being drawn into the story and enjoying it, but the writing style definitely makes it more of an effort to read than it needed to be.