The Master of Bruges is presented as the fictional memoirs of the 15th century artist, Hans Memling. In December 1464, following the death of his master, the Flemish painter Rogier van der Weyden, Hans travels to Bruges where he works at the Burgundian court, painting portraits of the nobility. As an artist, Memling is naturally a very observant, perceptive person and can offer the reader some insights into both the politics of the period and the lives and personalities of the people he meets in Bruges.
One night two strangers calling themselves ‘Ned and Dick Plant’ come to seek refuge at Memling’s house and Hans finds himself drawn into the drama and intrigues of the Wars of the Roses, the conflict between England’s House of York and House of Lancaster. And when several years later he is invited to England and renews his acquaintance with Ned and Dick, he becomes caught up in one of history’s greatest mysteries: the disappearance of Edward IV’s sons, the Princes in the Tower, who many people believe were murdered by their uncle, Richard III.
Before reading this book I had heard of Hans Memling but was not familiar with his work. The only one of his paintings I knew anything about was his triptych The Last Judgment, which featured a portrait of the banker Tommaso Portinari being weighed in St Michael’s scales, and was captured by the Danzig pirate Pauel Benecke as it was being shipped to Italy. The only reason I was aware of this anecdote was because it formed a minor plot point in Dorothy Dunnett’s House of Niccolo series (specifically, in To Lie with Lions and Caprice and Rondo). Luckily, many of Memling’s paintings can be seen online and I can guarantee that you’ll want to look at them as you read. There are also some short chapters interspersed throughout the novel in which Hans shares with us his views regarding artistic technique, perspective, focus, colours, and some of the tricks artists use to please their sitters, and I enjoyed reading these. As well as being fascinating to read, these chapters are relevant to the story as Memling’s descriptions of his techniques are either directly or indirectly linked to aspects of the plot.
I thought the first part of the novel, which details Hans’ early days as an artist, worked very well but not the second part, after he travels to England. I was interested in learning about Hans and his portraits and I was also interested in the Richard III story – it was the way the two were combined that didn’t work for me. Despite the Wars of the Roses being one of my areas of interest in historical fiction, I think I would have liked this book more if it had continued to tell the story of Memling’s life in Bruges rather than changing focus halfway through to concentrate on the mystery of the Princes in the Tower.
I don’t expect historical novelists to always stick rigidly to the facts, otherwise they would be writing non-fiction rather than fiction, but this particular book stretches credibility too much for me. I appreciated the author’s note at the end of the book, but I wished it had given more information on exactly which aspects of the story were based on fact and which were fictional. As far as I can tell there is no evidence to suggest that Hans Memling ever came to England or had any involvement with the Plantagenets. I also found it hard to believe Morgan’s theories regarding what happened to the two princes (especially a plan of Edward IV’s to have them declared illegitimate), though they were certainly very imaginative ideas. I was happy enough with the characterisation of Richard III, though – he is one of my favourite historical figures and I am definitely of the opinion that he has been unfairly treated by history, so it was good to see him portrayed in a more positive light in this book.
Because of the problems I’ve noted above, I can’t say that I loved The Master of Bruges, but I’m glad I kept reading to the end as there were some big surprises within the final chapters. I think as long as readers are aware that this book does not always give an entirely historically accurate account of the period and that it sometimes takes a more speculative approach to what might possibly have happened, it can be enjoyed as something refreshingly different and fun.
8 thoughts on “The Master of Bruges by Terence Morgan”
I love the Northern Renaissance painters – Jan van Eyck above all, but also Roger van der Weyden and Hans Memling. And of course any mention of Bruges brings Dunnett to mind. I had forgotten about Tommaso in the painting – he of the clashing rings! This does sound interesting.
I think the fact that I read the House of Niccolo so recently helped enhance my enjoyment of this book. I found I recognised a lot of the names of characters and the buildings in Bruges which I probably wouldn’t have been familiar with otherwise.
It sounds okay, but to use that line of thought for the princes in the tower, that would never have happened, it would make no sense. I like the sound of the chapters detailing the creation of the art, they sound interesting and educational, but for the historical liberties, I doubt I would read this one.
I’ve read lots of different theories in historical fiction novels regarding the princes in the tower, but the ones in this book were some of the least convincing I’ve read. I did love reading about the art, though.
Ah dear, Helen – I began reading this thinking, “Yes! Historical fiction with artists! Hurrah!” and then by the end of it your reservations were starting to claw at me. If this had been genuinely a novel about Memling I’d have snapped it up, but I’m afraid the slightest hint of a conspiracy theory is enough to put me off a book nowdays 🙂
The parts of the book that were solely about Memling and his art were fascinating. I didn’t think it was really necessary to have him becoming embroiled in the Wars of the Roses when there’s no evidence that the real Memling had any involvement in those events.
It is interesting to see how Richard III is being portrayed in various different novels. I suppose there will be books like this for the rest of time. But like you I think I would have liked a bit more substance I.e. Memling actually having been to England for the book to perhaps work for me.
I just wished the book had stuck more closely to the known facts of Memling’s life. I was really enjoying it before he suddenly became such good friends with Edward IV, Richard III and the two princes!