Witch Week: The Wicked Day by Mary Stewart

This week Lory of The Emerald City Book Review is hosting her annual Witch Week event, a celebration of fantasy books and authors. This year’s theme is Dreams of Arthur – books which draw on the Arthurian legends. Having read and loved Mary Stewart’s Merlin trilogy a few years ago, I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to read The Wicked Day, another of her Arthurian novels.

There is some overlap between The Wicked Day and the events of the final Merlin novel, The Last Enchantment, but in this book the focus switches to Mordred, the son of King Arthur and his half-sister, the witch Morgause. At the beginning of the novel, Mordred is being raised by peasants in the Orkney Islands and is unaware of his true parentage. It is only by chance that he is brought back into contact with his real mother, Morgause, by now the widow of King Lot of Lothian and Orkney, with whom she has had four more sons. Aware of Merlin’s prophecy suggesting that Mordred will be the cause of Arthur’s death, Morgause takes the boy into her household, sensing that he could be a useful weapon against Arthur.

Eventually, Morgause and her sons are summoned south to Camelot and Mordred will have to decide where his loyalties lie. But even if he chooses Arthur, will he be able to defy the prophecy or will he prove to be his father’s downfall after all?

I enjoyed this book, though maybe not quite as much as the three Merlin novels, which is probably because I found Merlin himself a more appealing character than Mordred. Having said that, Mary Stewart’s portrayal of Mordred is much more sympathetic than I had expected. Although my knowledge of Arthurian legend is very limited, I had gained the impression from other sources that Mordred was a villain, a traitor who betrayed Arthur. Stewart’s Mordred is not like that at all. He’s by no means perfect – he does have flaws and makes mistakes – but he always has the best of intentions and although he is ambitious any trouble he does cause for Arthur is largely due to circumstances outside his control.

As well as Mordred’s relationship with Arthur, his interactions with his four half-brothers – Gawain, Agravain, Gaheris and Gareth – are also explored. Their attitudes towards Mordred range from suspicion and rivalry to reluctant acceptance and respect. As I’ve said, I don’t know a lot about the Arthurian legends, so although I had heard of King Lot’s four sons and had a basic idea of how their stories would play out, it really was only a basic idea! The advantage of going into a book knowing very little about a subject is that you can be kept in suspense wondering what is going to happen and enjoy the story for its own sake, without any preconceived opinions; on the other hand, it would have been nice to have had other versions of the story and characters in mind so that I could have made comparisons and looked for similarities and differences.

At the end of the book we are given brief retellings of the sections of Sir Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur and Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain which deal with the Mordred legend. Stewart then goes on to explain why she chose to interpret Mordred’s character the way she did; I found it interesting to read that while she was writing the earlier Merlin novels she had accepted the traditional view of Mordred as a villain and only changed her mind when she came to research his story in detail.

As with Mary Stewart’s other Arthurian novels, the elements of fantasy in The Wicked Day are very subtle and understated, amounting to not much more than a few prophecies and visions. The 6th century Britain that she recreates is a real, believable place and her books feel much more like historical fiction than fantasy, which is possibly why I like them so much. I am planning to read her final Arthurian novel, The Prince and the Pilgrim, and will then see how other authors have approached the legends. When I reviewed The Last Enchantment I received lots of ideas for future reading in the comments, so I have plenty of books and authors to explore. Chris of Calmgrove has also put together a very informative guest post for Witch Week with more suggestions and recommendations.

17 thoughts on “Witch Week: The Wicked Day by Mary Stewart

  1. Lory @ Emerald City Book Review says:

    I’m still on The Last Enchantment, but I look forward to reading this one eventually.

    My favorite reimagining of the Mordred character (and one that Chris doesn’t mention in his amazingly wide-ranging post) is The Winter Prince by Elizabeth Wein, which with its sequels goes into quite a different direction than other versions.

  2. Calmgrove says:

    Mordred is definitely an interesting character, especially if you go back to the 10th-century Welsh Annals where it’s not at all clear if he’s regarded as on the same or the opposing side in the Battle of Camlann. I rather suspect that evil Mordred is an amalgamation from a number of models (including the arch-betrayer from the New Testament, Judas) and that it’s perfectly justifiable to portray him in fiction as both morally good and bad!

    (Robert Nye’s extremely bawdy Merlin was the last Mordred-centred novel I read — one to be avoided if you’re offended by explicit language or if you’ve a weak stomach — and despite its comic take it put me off any further fictional readings! I might make an exception for Elizabeth Wein, though …)

    Thanks though, Helen, for the appreciation (and Lory too!) — you can guess I could have expanded my post considerably if pushed, but that would have tested everyone’s patience!

    • Helen says:

      This is the first time I’ve read about Mordred in any detail. Mary Stewart does mention in her author’s note that in the earliest sources there is no evidence to say which side he was on in the battle or to suggest that he was evil, so she felt able to interpret his character either way.

      I think I’ll give the Robert Nye book a miss, but I might try the Elizabeth Wein one Lory mentions.

  3. Café Society says:

    It’s a long time since I read anything by Mary Stewart, although I remember very much enjoying the Merlin novels. I have read this but ‘The Prince and the Pilgrim’ is definitely one I’ve missed out on. Maybe I should go back and read all four of the earlier books just so I get the right sort of run in for the fifth. 😉

    • Helen says:

      I think The Prince and the Pilgrim is a standalone within the series rather than following on directly from the previous books. However, as the earlier Merlin books are so good, I would recommend re-reading them all anyway! 🙂

  4. piningforthewest says:

    I enjoyed this one too although like you – not quite as much as the first three. I’ve never really thought of these books as fantasy, they’re much closer to historical fiction I think and I like Stewart’s interpretation of Mordred’s character, she makes him seem more human.

    • Helen says:

      Yes, I like Stewart’s portrayal of Mordred as well – not a bad person, but not perfect either. I would be interested to see how other authors have interpreted his character too, as this is the only book I’ve read about him so far.

    • Helen says:

      I loved the character of Merlin in the first three books, so I missed him in this one. I did find it interesting to learn more about Mordred, though.

  5. Judy Krueger says:

    It has been too long since I read a Mary Stewart novel. She does not appear on my 1963 list of which I have read about half the titles. But This Rough Magic was an American bestseller in 1964 and I am looking forward to that one!

Please leave a comment. Thanks!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s