Almost a year ago, I read Tracy Borman’s The King’s Witch for last year’s 20 Books of Summer challenge; now the second novel in the trilogy is available and has become my fourth book for this year’s 20 Books of Summer!
In The King’s Witch we met Frances Gorges, a young 17th century noblewoman whose knowledge of the healing properties of herbs and flowers leads to accusations of witchcraft. The book ends shortly after the foiling of the Gunpowder Plot, in which Frances has become embroiled, and The Devil’s Slave picks up the story just a few months later, in April 1606.
Following the dramatic events that brought the previous novel to a close, Frances has retreated to her family’s estate, Longford in Wiltshire, to mourn the loss of the man she loved and give birth to their child. But Longford is now in the hands of her hostile brother, Edward, and is no longer the safe place she remembers. When she receives a proposal of marriage from Thomas Tyringham, the king’s ‘Master of the Buckhounds’, who agrees to raise her young son as his own, she accepts, although she doesn’t think she will ever be able to love again. Promising to stay out of any more political or religious intrigue, Frances tries to settle into her new life at Tyringham Hall – but it is not long until she and Thomas are drawn back to court and Frances finds herself caught up in a new Catholic conspiracy.
I loved this book; the reservations I had about the first one (mainly the slow pace at the beginning and the story being not quite what I’d expected) were not problems this time and I was engrossed from the first page. This is such a fascinating period of history, yet being sandwiched between the end of Elizabeth I’s reign in 1603 and the Civil Wars of 1642-1651, it often tends to be overlooked. There’s so much going on in this novel – the court of James VI of Scotland and I of England appears to be a hotbed of plotting and scheming, and with her Catholic background and previous connections with the Gunpowder conspiracists, Frances is right at the heart of it all. It’s never clear who can and can’t be trusted and Tracy Borman does an excellent job of showing how dangerous life at court is, particularly for a woman like Frances whose previous actions have already aroused suspicion.
When I read The King’s Witch, I felt surprised that the witchcraft element wasn’t as strong as the title had made me expect. This time, I had different expectations. I knew that it wasn’t going to form a very big part of the story, although it is always there in the background; every time Frances uses her skills to help someone who is ill or dying, you know that someone could be watching and remembering, storing away the information to bring up at a later date and use it against Frances and her family. Halfway through the novel we see Frances visiting Belvoir Castle, home of the Earl of Rutland, and there are hints that some of the castle servants are involved in witchcraft. Tracy Borman states in her author’s note that this will be brought to life in the third novel, so I’m looking forward to that!
Although Frances Gorges was a real person, very little is known about her, so not everything that she does in the novel is based on historical fact. However, we also meet some well-known figures of the period, ranging from Sir Walter Raleigh (imprisoned in the Tower of London for the duration of the novel), the king’s two sons Prince Henry and the future Charles I, and Arbella Stuart, a possible claimant to the throne. I was intrigued by the characterisation of Robert Cecil – he had been very much the villain of the previous novel but in this one there is a suggestion that there may be another side to him! I also loved Thomas Tyringham (who also really existed) and was pleased to see that Frances’s feelings towards him grew warmer as time went by.
The way the book ended made it clear that there is more trouble ahead for Frances, but I hope there will be happiness too. I can’t wait to see what Tracy Borman has in store for her in the third book in the trilogy.
Thanks to Hodder & Stoughton for providing a copy of this book for review via NetGalley.
This is book 4/20 of my 20 Books of Summer.
This is very much my period, Helen, given that Shakespeare is still writing and reflecting what is happening in the world around him in those plays. I shall have to think about getting copies of these.
I don’t really know all that much about this specific period. I can see how a good knowledge of it would help to put Shakespeare’s plays in context.
Is it necessary to read the first book to enjoy this one?
I don’t think it’s completely necessary. This book recaps most of the important events from the first one.
It’s a fascinating period of history – a turning point in terms of the relationship between King and citizens but you’re so right that it hasn’t been featured that much in literature. I suppose the Tudors are always seen as the ‘fun’ gang.
The Tudors have been written about so often, it’s nice to see this slightly later period being given some attention.
Absolutely….
You have found a new author to love!
Yes, I think so. She has written a lot of non-fiction too, which I’m looking forward to reading.
Sounds like something I should read, although fiction, to help me fill in the gap between James VI / I and Charles I. In my mind, James stabilized the country, but apparently not, eh? Somewhere was laid the groundwork for the future Cromwell to disrupt the whole political and religious situation, like kicking over the barrel and spilling all the apples to set them rolling down the hills and valleys.
Well, James’s reign was more stable than the ones that came before and after, but still not free from conspiracies and threats to his throne. Then, of course, there was the death of his eldest son, Prince Henry – everything could have been so different if he had lived!
I remember enjoying the first one, so will look forward to picking this up some time.
I’m glad to hear you enjoyed the first book, Liz. I think this one is even better!
I think this is such an interesting period and the fact that the protagonist is a real person makes this even more intriguing. Can I just read Book 2?
I would recommend reading both books if you can, but yes, I’m sure you could just read this one if you wanted to. The first chapter gives us a reminder of the important things that happened in the previous book.
I’m glad this one was better than the previous one.
I wasn’t sure whether to read this book after having one or two problems with the previous one, but I’m so glad I did!
I like the sound of this series – the time period is one I know and have read little to nothing about. I can only think of reading about Arbella Stuart in The Girl in the Glass Tower. I hope you enjoy the next book.
I remember reading about Arbella Stuart in The Girl in the Glass Tower too. She is portrayed very differently in this book!
Interesting!